Hi again Ladybt28,
Utrogestan has already been given a green light on NSH Grampian, so no, it's not being denied, it's just a matter of priorities and resources, but it is available for menopausal women.
https://foi.nhsgrampian.org/globalassets/foidocument/foi-public-documents1---all-documents/fgd201909.pdf
I don't want to sound confrontational, so I won't post on this thread any more, I think it's easier to generalise and suppose than to investigate and understand exactly what are the real facts.
Clovie has mentioned that she has been prescribed Utrogestan by a specialist and only been denied it by her GP, so all I have said makes total sense.
Hi Choc Ice ![Smiley :)](https://www.menopausematters.co.uk/forum/Smileys/extended/smiley.gif)
Thanks for this!
Hardly a recent thing is it? I've been with my GP for FIVE years now and just now mentioning it. Hence I think it's a cost cutting exercise perhaps!
My Utrogestan was actually prescribed by a meno specialist at a clinic so I'm hoping I can keep it.
Either way I'll be arguing my case for keeping it!
Edited - please could you give me a link to the Tayside info? Thank you in advance
BeaR.
The thread has developed since clovie's original post and what ladybt (and I) are taking issue with is kilted Cupid's speculation as to the reasons for the Scotland NHS decision (whatever that is!) not to recommended Utrogestan for menopause purposes (or withdraw it?), and her subsequent judgement and comments on that supposed reason, as well as the tone of some of these comments!
As it is – we have not seen (on this forum) any very recent communication or statements from NHS Scotland indicating either that Utrogestan is dangerous/unsafe nor that it should not be prescribed even as second line of treatment. In fact the recent letter I linked to in relation to the HRT shortages implies that Utrogestan can now be considered if alternatives are in short supply – and this is, in any case, in my view, allowed for in the post-script of the 2009 statement not recommending Utrogestan (on cost grounds) while acknowledging that it has equal efficacy compared with other progestogens ie perfectly safe. Recent letter:
https://www.sehd.scot.nhs.uk/pca/PCA2019%28P%2918.pdfI imagine that the addition of utrogestan to the updated Grampian list you linked to bear (17th Sept) might have been made as a result of the letter from NHS Scotland (26 Aug).
https://www.sehd.scot.nhs.uk/pca/PCA2019%28P%2918.pdfI would urge anyone encountering a problem to draw the attention of their surgery/local practice to this letter - in case it does any good!. Anyway, once again, even if it is not on the local formulary list we still haven't had an answer whether a doctor (ie local GP) can override the local recommendations as they can in England, which the wording of the 2009 ruling implies they can, as well as the experiences of many on here - that they are happily obtaining utrogestan from their GP.
Also bear - clovie has been getting it for FIVE YEARS from her GP and we have had no good reason for the recent suggestions apart from incorrect stats - which sound like the opinion of that particular doctor, as there is no scientific basis for it.
Also - it should be available as FIRST line of treatment - to women who would like it, without having to wait for an appointment at a menopause clinic ( unless these are more numerous and with shorter waiting lists than England?). if it's just a question of a letter - than that would be no problem - but you have to have the support from the GP so better that they have the power to say yay or nay, provided one can argue one's case, and the local formulary guidance can be overriden.
I know I keep saying the same things but it is a matter of principle as well as process - and the latter is still not clear.
Clovie - did you guess your post would create such a lively discussion?!
![Grin ;D](https://www.menopausematters.co.uk/forum/Smileys/extended/grin.gif)
Hurdity x