Interesting reply Hurdity, to say the least.
Pleased to read it some time after I originally posted, so I do appreciate the fact you took time to consider your response
First, to clarify, I have NOT "put down all other contributors because you think they are untrained or qualified".
I simply object to (some) regular posters who appear to be keen to present as being clinical experts, especially with high levels of misleading (subjective) information
It's the equivalent of the pub/backroom lawyer.
It is always helpful to hear of others poster's views, comments and experiences, whether similar to mine or not.
I do, however, have problems with posters on MM who cite very authoritive global comments and opinions about the efficacy and use of HRT treatments regimes or otherwise, whether obtained via the NHS or privately. without being medically qualified to do so.
I have ever only cited my personal experiences, which I hope is useful for women reading this site and for them to consider their personal options.
I note, however, that you kindly,and frequently, very willing offer extensive advice, your non clinical opinion, and have done for some time about HRT treatment regimes.
Some individuals 'may' inadvertently think you are either medically qualified to offer such advice, as you seem to present your views with such conviction?
You wouldn't want possible legal action to ensure after all, so maybe for your own sake make it clear in future posts you make you aren't clinically qualified to comment?
I only mention that as a friend recently successfully sued a similar online poster (actually the forum) on a menopause forum in the US. The laws are a bit different there but seem to apply equally here in the UK.
There is a HUGE difference between posting advice, observations, personal experiences and then offering clinical suggestions which borders on the line of presenting being an "expert".
I'm sure it's most likely the case that you didn't intended your past posts to be construed that your opinion is an authoritative one?
And no doubt you will be keen to make that clear to other posters, in case they misconstrue your opinion as being clinically reliable and valid.
Yes, of course, I do consider it "dodgy" to accept clinical advice from a stranger or strangers from an internet forum.
Who wouldn't? Doh?!
I just "warn off other members because they you think they are unqualified or untrained"?
No, I'm just politely warning other posters not to accept your (and some others) very detailed posts about clinical treatments/regimes to adhere to, crosses the boundary between personal experiences and clinical advice that's all.
Most posters on MM seem to be able to distinguish the difference.
As is often the case on here, what I was saying has been mis-quoted
So read around ladies (and gents) here and Goggle for information. the whole issue of HRT can (initially) be over whelming.
Hurdity, if you feel that you are subject of "too frequent digs" then, maybe ,as a qualified Chartered Scientist, Chartered Psychologist, Consultant Clinical Psychologist in real life, you might take some time out to think about the content and nature of your posts and why so many people object to them, both off and online?
Just a suggestion.
Hope the above clarifies your misperception of my post.
Freckles x