I think they should look at the long term cost. ADs won't protect our heart or bones. There is a good chance we will go through many more investigations and long term illnesses if on ADs as opposed to HRT. During my time off HRT last year I visited the doctor 4 times, saw 2 specialists and had numerous tests with prescriptions for all sorts of things I now don't need because I'm back on HRT. While I was on HRT it was just an annual check up for the HRT. Some women find they feel sedated on ADS and can't hold down a job or function as well - what does this cost the economy?. I'm just about to turn 59 and I'm hoping I can stay on HRT for at least the next 10 years so I can work till I'm 70 - surely much better for the economy. DG x
Not exactly the same thing as you talk about, DG, but since I've been experiencing peri symptoms, I've been to the GP 6 times, to a&e once, had 4 ecg' s, an ECHO scan, 24 hour heart monitor, numerous blood tests (but not sex hormone tests), a 24 hour urine collection test (that now has to be repeated because the surgery didn't label it correctly
)...all because my GP insists I'm too young for peri. She's itching to prescribe anti d's, which would mean more GP visits, possibly psychiatrists appointments and would cost me in increased life insurance premiums.
What a waste, all because GP s can't/won't recognise perimenopause.