Hi there - there's not much I can add really - Dancinggirl you have explained it all fine!
Btw I have been very very busy since Thurs eve until now without a moment to spare or to myself and haven't been on the forum - sometimes members aren't able just to add advice at the time of posting - we all come along and advise or share experiences when we can and as our lives permit!
Just to add that I am a Utrogestan user, and also that I mentioned elsewhere a few days ago that the main reason women are prescribed cyclical HRT until post-menopause or nearly so is because the bleed is then predictable. Many women find that the peaks and troughs of their own cycle causes more unpredictable bleeding and spotting as it breaks through if they take continuous progesterone while peri.
I'm not sure why you were prescribed Utrogestan 100 mg for 25 days 2cats? As Dancinggirl suggests maybe the GP is confused because 200mg is no longer available but as she says if you want to go on cyclical HRT the licensed dose is 200 mg for 12 days so double should be prescribed. However maybe the doc is responding to your concerns re PMS - and continuous progesterone should more or less eliminate this because it eliminates the cycle? However if you want to be able to compare how you feel on both different products I would continue with cyclical and take 2 x 100 mg for 12 days (you should have enough for this) and then mention to the doc on your next visit. If you tolerate the Utrogestan well then try out the conti approach. You will feel different of course because Cyclogest is a perssary and utrogestan is taken (normally) orally unless you were planning to use it vaginally?
Freda - as Dancinggirl says. If you think you are still having a natural cycle then probably best to stay with sequi so take the 2 x 100 mg from day 15 to 26 but perhaps phone the doc and explain that's what you are doing because you are still peri - or ask him/her why you have been prescribed the post-meno regime.
The cost is the same either way.
Hurdity x