Hi flaxhigh
Firstly one measurement alone of estradiol is not necessarily accurate enough to say that it is consistently that low. 50 mcg patch is licensed for the prevention of osteoporosis but of course women absorb differently and as joziel says that protection is dose dependent ( on oestrogen).
Serum levels as measured will vary depending on several factors but especially in relation to patch change date. eg mine varied by 100 pmol/l between being taken on the morning I was due to change my patch and half way through - say day 2 after new patch, (I used to change it every 3.5 days now every 3). My levels were around 90 at the lowest and then just under 200 during the middle of the patch life. Since then I have increased very slightly from 50 mcg to 62,5 mcg. I am 70 and I have not lost any height. Never had BMD measured but not worried. I imagine my levels are somewhere around 200 but maybe a bit more? When younger - possible late 50's or early 60's I remember them being 212 - on 50 mcg patch.
In terms of research and absolute estradiol levels, I have several times unsuccessfully tried to find a study which said that minimum levels should be something like 165 or 185 - but this was quite a few years ago and I can't remember what the study was. Have just looked again and have found these studies:
1
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1458336/Minimal levels of serum estradiol prevent postmenopausal bone lossWe conclude that in postmenopausal women receiving an estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), a significant reduction of bone resorption is achieved when circulating levels of estradiol reach a value (60 pg/ml) corresponding to the one measured, in eugonadal women, during the last days of the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. We suggest that oral or percutaneous ERT should induce a minimal value of 60 pg/ml to prevent postmenopausal bone loss
[60 pg/ml = 220 pmol/l]
2
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1258/0004563021902107Hormone replacement therapy (oestradiol-only preparations):
can the laboratory recommend a concentration of plasma
oestradiol to protect against osteoporosis? (2002)
In the discussion the paper quotes Studd's research but using implants:
"Studd and co-workers44 were the first to look at the
relationship between plasma oestradiol and bone
density in women, using 6-monthly implants of
75mg oestradiol and 0¢1mg testosterone. Bone
density was measured at the lumbar vertebrae and
neck of femur by dual-photon absorptiometry before
therapy and after 1year of subcutaneous therapy. The
method of measurement of oestradiol was not
reported. Of the 23 patients studied, 22 showed an
increase in bone density after 1year of therapy. All
patients had a pre-implantation serum oestradiol
concentration greater than 200 pmol/L at 1year and
a correlation between oestradiol level and bone
accretion was observed. There was no correlation
between plasma testosterone level and the increase in
bone density.
In a later study, by the same group, the oestradiol
levels using three different doses of implant, 25,50 and
75mg, were reported.45 This study also found a
significant relation between plasma oestradiol levels
and increases in bone density at the lumbar spine and
proximal femur. They concluded that none of the
women lost bone density at the clinically important
sites of spine and femoral neck if their oestradiol levels
were above 300 pmol/L."
So it seems they are suggesting a higher level than I recall, but also asd you see below, that more research is needed and they say earlier, with different preparations of oestrogen:
"Conclusion
…., the trend to use HRT
preparations which deliver lower doses of oestradiol
means that the clinical need for establishing a bone
density response is greater than ever. Early measurement
of oestradiol levels within the first few months of
treatment has been proposed to fulfil this need.
However, there is a paucity of evidence to support the
setting of target levels at present. Further studies are
clearly required in this area.”
Looking at this and if your levels are consistently 140 ish then an increase would be advisable. Joziel I would love to see the references for those figures if you have them? ie the 400 pmol/l for treating osteoporosis?
I did read some years ago too that the aim of HRT was to average the level the average woman achieved over the menstrual cycle when fertile - and this was approx 300 pmol/l (from memory) - but that was not for bone density, but general relief from symptoms and well-being and I think for women undergoing the menopausal transition (not sure if that level was based on research either!).
What progestogen are you taking?
I agree with joziel that a gradual increase is advisable. If you are very sensitive to sudden increases, I would start with 75 mcg patch, and cut down to approx 62.5 for a few weeks, and then 75 mcg etc.....if your levels are being measured then ask for a measurement after you are stabilised on 75 mcg and get the measurement taken half-way through the patch change cycle.
Also change your patch every 3 days....
Hope this helps
Hurdity x