I just think the whole thing has been handled very badly at the surgery. This is the second time in only three reviews, the third this week, that it has come to me, rather than the specialists, to explain, justify or make decisions about my prescriptions. The first time was from the attached pharmacist and now from a gp I never see and who knows nothing about this new trial and error journey I am on, which is difficult enough, but has not the decency to call me herself to explain why she is refusing; on what informed basis on medical grounds (of which there are none). To be asked which one, internal or external, I feel is of the most benefit as I "can't have both" within a process of trial and error in which I can't possibly know myself at this stage is both humiliating and, far more worryingly, devoid of understanding of menopause management. These sorts of discussions should not be three-way with receptionists, however. Yes, it would seem by far the simplest thing to receive the prescription directly from the prescriber, but it seems the specialists are deemed to be making recommendations or suggestions for the gp to approve as it is the gp who is legally responsible for any outcome from what they have signed? I was told by the specialist that the gp "needs to know" what they're signing. It just all seems a needlessly complicated process as the more people that are involved, the greater likelihood of this sort of chaos.
We all know how difficult this process can be, especially initially, but ironically made worse by the very issues we need our prescriptions for.