Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Follow us on Twitter and Facebook

media

Author Topic: Prof J Studd  (Read 5811 times)

Mother bean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Prof J Studd
« on: January 18, 2018, 10:05:56 AM »

Good Morning Ladies,

I have received this email from Prof John Studd and felt worth sharing with you lovely ladies! It is mainly to do with HRT.



Professor John Studd

January 2018: Newsletter
It has been a good year for HRT

NICE has at last recognised that oestrogen therapy is beneficial and safe and several of the WHI authors are publishing their views on the errors of medication in the study, the selection of patients, the collection of data and the shameless premature presentation of unjustified conclusions to the press 4 days before it was presented to the profession. The press you will remember had a field day but the authors are now queuing up to apologise for the harm that they have done to millions of women who have been denied treatment for symptoms and for the prevention of osteoporosis, heart attacks and severe depression.

Unfortunately, the inaccurate bad news is now in the undergraduate textbooks and it will take a generation to get rid of it. Many GPs are up to date but there remains a resistance in the majority who prefer to prescribe antidepressants or nothing at all. One can only hope that they see the light when their longstanding suffering patients return cured with the appropriate oestrogen therapy. However, there is no such hope to be had from psychiatrists who are trapped in their ignorance of the effect that female hormones have upon mood. How else can we explain premenstrual depression, postnatal depression, menopausal depression, or depression following hysterectomy and removal of ovaries without an understanding of the effects of oestrogen, progesterone and testosterone on mood? There are good scientific papers in prestigious journals such as the Lancet (sorry many are mine) to support the value of transdermal hormones in the treatment of depression in women

Happily there is no dispute about the value of HRT for hot flushes / insomnia or vaginal dryness / painful intercourse/ loss of libido but depression remains a problem for women who are denied hormones. I have been in contact with an old friend a former President of the Royal College of Psychiatrists with this problem only to be told that “nobody at the college is interested in hearing about hormones and depression”. There will be no help from psychiatrists but it is coming from unexpected sources – Celebrities. The latest to break cover and go public is a patient who in a series of TV appearances and newspaper articles has told of the debilitating effect of the post-menopausal state leading to profound depression and extreme suicidal thoughts. This debilitating problem was cured within weeks of starting the appropriate therapy and she remains well 2 years later. But what is the “appropriate therapy”

The correct HRT

The most obvious fact is that we should avoid any oral therapy whether it is the logical oestradiol, which is the hormone produced by women naturally, or the ridiculous collection of preparations containing horse-oestrogens such as Premarin Premique Prempro etc. Oestradiol should be given transdermally as this route avoids the first pass liver stimulation of clotting factors with oral oestrogens which lead to the probable increase in deep vein thrombosis, heart attacks and stroke with oral oestrogens whether it is the oral contraceptive pill or HRT.

Testosterone, is often thought of as male hormone but the ovaries in young women produce very large amounts of this, naturally and it is very useful for problems of mood, energy and libido. 93% of my HRT patients also have testosterone as well as transdermal oestradiol with excellent results.

Women with a uterus need endometrial protection with progesterone either tablets or a Mirena coil but continuous progestogens should be avoided because if there is a risk of breast cancer with HRT as it is probably due to continuous synthetic progestogens and NOT oestrogens. All studies looking at oestrogen alone reveal a decreased or a no change incidence of breast cancer.




 
The types of transdermal oestradiol are:
Gels - Oestrogel My first choice or Sandrena sachets (for hand luggage)

Patches - Estradot Evorel 

For Testosterone there are gels Testim or Testogel both only licensed for men but are used in women using a smaller dose. There was a patch licensed for women called Intrinsa but the manufactures discontinued it on commercial grounds. It wasn't selling enough because the manufacturers recommended too low a dose. One of the lessons of HRT is that one has to use a dose that works. This will be assessed by the history of response rather than repeated blood tests.

Another brilliant means of delivering oestrogen and testosterone is by a hormone implant which is convenient, painless and lasts about 6 months. It is ideal for women post-hysterectomy but is rarely available on the NHS and it is more expensive than gels or patches.

Bio identical Hormones

The therapy outlined above is all “bioidentical” and has been used by many of us in Europe for 20 years. No, it is not a clever American invention as they are still stuck with oral oestrogens particularly the ghastly Premarin. The hormones I use can all be obtained on the NHS if your GP is willing although he/she will probably decline to prescribe testosterone as it is not licensed for women now that the patches have been withdrawn.

This treatment should not be confused with the many purveyors of bioidentical hormones on the internet who use oestradiol and testosterone (so far so good) orally (not so good) with oestrone and estriol (2 weak and unnecessary oestrogens), DHEA which only works when converted to testosterone and daily progesterone either orally or by cream which is not even absorbed. These oral tablets or lozenges are manufactured by compounding pharmacies which are unregulated for safety and efficiency. There is a move in the UK and USA to have them banned as a health hazard. Indeed, last year the Adverising Standard Authority has ruled that the claims made in promoting bio-identical hormone treatment is misleading, with no evidence to the claims that such treatment is more effective or safer to the HRT I describe above. Another warning - if any of these practitioners invite you to measure your salivary hormones in order to have a bespoke made to measure HRT you should head for the hills and take your wallet with you!


The Future

I have no doubt that future research into the efficacy and safety of HRT will continue to be supportive and accepted by all. The exception are psychiatrists who will continue with their misdiagnoses labelling severe PMS as bipolar disorder and treating with antidepressants and mood stabilizers which not only do not work but produce weight gain, loss of libido and increasing anxiety and depression . And then of course there is always ECT-shock therapy!

My personal commitment is clear. I opened the first menopause clinic Europe in Birmingham when I was a trainee in 1969 and have opened clinics in Nottingham, Kings London and Chelsea and Westminster Hospital which are all still thriving. I have witnessed the changing often hostile attitudes to HRT over the years. After compulsory retirement from the NHS and the University at 65 I am in full time private practice but I am still involved with research, lecturing and providing the best service for women with hormonal problems including osteoporosis. I am not stepping down but increasingly my two colleagues Michael Savvas (senior consultant at Kings) and Neale Watson (senior consultant at Hillingdon) are doing sessions – currently one per week. They were both research fellows and trainees of mine at Kings and they were involved with the original research on hormones for the menopause and depression in women. I will still be doing three sessions a week until my two colleagues become too popular.

Happy New Year and a healthy 2018 to you all.

Best wishes,

John Studd
46 Wimpole St
02074860497
Copyright © 2018 Professor John Studd, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email as a patient of Professor John Studd's practice at 46 Wimpole St, London

Our mailing address is:
Professor John Studd
46 Wimpole Street
London, W1G 8SD
United Kingdom

Add us to your address book


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Logged

Dotty

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3923
Re: Prof J Studd
« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2018, 10:43:49 AM »

Interesting reading
Logged

Sarai

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 606
Re: Prof J Studd
« Reply #2 on: January 18, 2018, 10:59:40 AM »

Thank you for that. Very interesting. Good to know that NICE finally have agreed about benefits of HRT.
Logged

Annie0710

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3862
Re: Prof J Studd
« Reply #3 on: January 18, 2018, 11:07:22 AM »

Thank you x
Logged

Mary G

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2466
Re: Prof J Studd
« Reply #4 on: January 18, 2018, 11:13:25 AM »

Thanks, as a fellow patient I was thinking of posting his newsletter one here but you beat me to it!
Logged

Cassie

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1825
Re: Prof J Studd
« Reply #5 on: January 18, 2018, 11:27:05 AM »

Spot on. ;)
Logged

Bring me Sunshine

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 138
  • Menopause really isnt that bad. said no woman ever
Re: Prof J Studd
« Reply #6 on: January 18, 2018, 11:35:13 AM »

That information is so interesting, thank you for taking time to share it x
Logged

Dancinggirl

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7091
Re: Prof J Studd
« Reply #7 on: January 18, 2018, 12:33:08 PM »

Thank you for sharing this Mother bean. Very interesting and helpful for many women.

It is alarming to think that psychiatrists are so resistant to the views of fellow professionals!!!!  Also very worrying that the initial findings from that, very flawed, survey is still in text books that trains our future doctors. Why this statement from an eminent professor is not circulated around every GP practise is a mystery to me - do none of them read the Lancet?? My father was a dental surgeon and I know he read it very carefully as he always wanted to be fully up to date.

AS for the NICE guidelines acknowledging the benefits of HRT - well, the new guidelines that came out a couple of years ago were good but I'm afraid it seems very few GPs, or even gynaecologists, seem to have read this!!!

DG x
Logged

Mother bean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: Prof J Studd
« Reply #8 on: January 18, 2018, 10:13:47 PM »

I have been a member of this forum for a couple of years now and have truly found it a life saver to me personally by reading and learning from each ladies experience and can't thank you enough for also sharing your own journeys so I wanted to share something back that was emailed over to me!
Even though we are lucky to have the NHS sadly there are very few GP's who can truly advise us what is the best path to take during this journey.
The first time I visited my own GP at 49 (now 54) with some symptoms that were frightening me, and all she suggested to me was to check my bloods and asked had I thought about taking antidepressants and seeing a counsellor for anxiety!!! Not once was the menopause mentioned only asking me if something in my life had changed to make me feel anxious!
Prof Studd was the one who has helped get my life back on track and even though I am not completely there I have more of an understanding in what is going on and how to deal with certain things and this has truly helped me to face things and understand my journey.
I am grateful for being able to use HRT and in my eyes it is only replacing what our bodies are now lacking. Joy xxx
Logged

Bring me Sunshine

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 138
  • Menopause really isnt that bad. said no woman ever
Re: Prof J Studd
« Reply #9 on: January 18, 2018, 11:08:10 PM »

I so agree with what you are saying Mother bean.  There should be a menopause expert in every surgery or a menopause clinic in every town.  I did hear of people setting up menopause coffee mornings which i thought was a good idea and men even go to get advice on how they can help their wives/partners.  No one at work talks about it. my friends all seem fine so far and women at the gym cant wait to tell me how they sailed threw it.  i was beginning to feel i was a freak until i found this forum.  When I am well I shall run the great north run again and do it for the menopause society(have never seen anyone run for that before) perhaps they need highlighting to raise money to open more clinics.  We should not be struggling at this time in our lives, we should be enjoying life and not have to keep looking for answers/support because gps have failed to get us on the right track to start off with and we certainly should not have to pay for help.  I know gps have to know a little about a lot of things but menopause is so in the news now thanks in part to the celebrities(as prof studd said).  it was Carol Vordermans article that made me think perhaps this is what is happening to me and it was.

Well Done you xx
Logged

Lanzalover

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 600
Re: Prof J Studd
« Reply #10 on: January 19, 2018, 06:09:01 AM »

Thanks Mother bean

Interesting read.

Lanzalover x
Logged

Mindfulmoomins

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 289
Re: Prof J Studd
« Reply #11 on: January 19, 2018, 06:08:52 PM »

Can I ask a question about Prof Studd? He says that women with reproductive depression often felt well in pregnancy.

I didn't. I felt low and anxious literally the day I conceived.

I felt a bit better as the time went on but felt much better after giving birth. I had PND about 3 months after having my daughter and have always had pmt getting much worse in the past 2 years.

I am hoping I am going to respond to Estrogel 3 pumps at some point (just over a month in). I guess I am worried I maybe don't fit what he says about hormonal depression/anxiety as I didn't feel great in pregnancy.

Is it just a case that we are all different? X
Logged

Dancinggirl

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7091
Re: Prof J Studd
« Reply #12 on: January 19, 2018, 10:24:06 PM »

Mindfulmoomins - your post is interesting.  Though Studd has done some great research and helped many women enormously, he is a bit pedantic and to just put so much that women suffer down to hormonal issues, is also flawed - there can be many things that effects our mood and anxiety.  Men will still blame PMT when they find women ‘difficult or temperamental!!! A very chauvinist view!!!
When you say you might not ‘fit' what he says - this highlights the fact that we all need a holistic approach. To simply send each patient away with his standard treatment of Oestrogen, Utrogestan and testim - this is basically saying once size fits all and should cure all!!!  I find that slightly worrying.  I found Utrogestan the most troublesome progesterone of all the ones I tried.

Mindful - if your symptoms are hormone related (it does sound to me as though they are), then his regime may well help but it may take some months - be patient.  If not, then at least you have tried this and you may have to seek other alternative treatments. HRT is still the first line treatment for meno symptoms - NOT ADs/SSRIs.
Good luck and stay positive.  DG x
Logged

Mindfulmoomins

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 289
Re: Prof J Studd
« Reply #13 on: January 19, 2018, 10:44:31 PM »

Thank you DG for continuing to have faith I'll find a way through this and for your thoughts xx
Logged

Bring me Sunshine

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 138
  • Menopause really isnt that bad. said no woman ever
Re: Prof J Studd
« Reply #14 on: January 19, 2018, 11:38:10 PM »

Mindfulmoomins Everything will be alright in the end, if it isnt alright then it isnt the end.

YOU WILL GET BETTERxxxx
Logged