Kate50, that's interesting but where does that leave you now?
I have never heard that you can't stay on a bleed cycle for more than 5 years. What does this gynaecologist do when she has a patient who has to limit their Utrogestan intake after 5 years? What kind of blood tests was she referring to? I can't see how they would be a substitute for a proper ultrasound scan.
Re the Utrogestan dose she prescribes, as far as I am concerned, it is never going to happen because I categorically cannot take that much - I would have migraines 24 hours a day. My gynaecologist would disagree with her regarding scans because she thinks all women should have a uterine scan every year - she says there is much more to worry about than just the lining, what about ovaries, fibroids etc? Also, it's not just women on HRT that get lining build up, women who have never taken HRT can get it post menopause so they also need to be checked. Someone I used to work with would probably be alive today if she had been given regular scans.
If a woman can tolerate Utrogestan well then fine, no problem with the recommended dose, but if they are intolerant (like me) and it is not possible to take the recommended dose then having a scan is the only other option and I think gynaecologists should be open to that idea. I have cheated like mad and taken much less than the recommended dose yet my last scan showed a lining measurement of 2mm (immediately after a period) so it does show that one size very definitely does not fit all and if I took any more, I could end up with womb erosion.
I think a flexible approach is needed and I can obviously take less Utrogestan so chances are many other women can too. So if Utrogestan is making your life a misery and ruining your HRT regime, my advice is not to assume you need the maximum dose, find out.
If anyone reading this has had lining build up with the 100mg 7 day Utrogestan Prof Studd regime, it would be good to hear from them.