Interesting articles - the first two referring to an observational study showing the risk is there but not establishing a casual relationship (between the use of ADs and bone loss). However because of the widespread and long term use of ADs especially in women, this apparent increased risk and the mouse study indicate an urgent need for proper trials to investigate this so that if there is a direct causal link, the extent of the risk can be quantified.
It would be appalling if, not only do ADs not replace oestrogen and therefore fail to prevent the natural bone loss that occurs following menopause, but actually speed this up and do even more harm!
The cynic in me says there is likely to be great resistance in developing such trials because the pharmas make such a huge amount of money from the AD industry, so who would fund a trial suggesting they are damaging to our health, or that the risks may outweigh the benefits?
lily - are you unable to take HRT - I have a feeling you have and we have discussed in the past? Sorry I've forgotten if so.
Hurdity x