Hi dogdoc
Just catching up as have been away so
![welcomemm :welcomemm:](https://www.menopausematters.co.uk/forum/Smileys/extended/welcomemm.gif)
from me too....
I see you are beginning peri-menopause at quite a young age and sorry to hear about all your symptoms.
Also that you've obviously read up a lot about menopause, interested in all of it and what's happening to your body, and wanting to take control - good for you!
There are so many points in your posts - firstly the bit about stroke risk etc. At your young age, taking HRT is not thought to increase the usual risks cited, and you should replace oestrogen until at least the natural avergae age of menopause of 50-52. As Dr Currie says on this site at age under 50 the benefits exceed the risks:
http://www.menopausematters.co.uk/balance.phpIf you want to read a scientific paper about menopause, diseases and risks of HRT (and I see you like that sort of thing
![Smiley :)](https://www.menopausematters.co.uk/forum/Smileys/extended/smiley.gif)
), there was an excellent summary paper published to mark World Menopause Day last October and was posted on this site, entitled "Prevention of Diseases After Menopause"
http://www.imsociety.org/downloads/world_menopause_day_2014/white_paper/wmd_white_paper_english.pdfRe stroke it says " .... the risk of stroke from MHT (menopausal hormone therapy) is rare and of the same magnitude as seen with other medications such as statins and aspirin used in the prevention of CHD in women. When initiated in women < 60 years old and/or < 10 years since menopause, the benefits of MHT (menopausal hormone therapy) outweighs the risks, as MHT statistically significantly reduces Coronary Heart Disease and all cause mortality.....". The discussion is quite complex relating to different ages of treatment (with HRT), and age since menopause and re-analysis of the WHI study data. If you haven't seen it already I'm sure you will find it interesting reading
![Smiley :)](https://www.menopausematters.co.uk/forum/Smileys/extended/smiley.gif)
Regarding oestradiol levels - I see you've had several measurments at the same stage in your cycle. Just to check that we're all talking with the same units of measurements as in UK the units are pmol/l and in US they are pg/mol - not sure what they are in Canada but from the figures you've given it does sound like pmol/l?
Even so - is that really low for Day 3? It looks to be within the range for Day 5 which would be higher than Day 3?
I am interested in the idea of being able to shut down a cycle at 50 mcg estradiol too. I can't imagine how this would happen although my knowledge about the detailed hormonal changes is rudimentary!! I mean the pre-ovulatory peak is enormous and I would have thought 50 mcg wouldn't have an appreciable effect on the cycle to switch it off completely but would be interested to have a mechanistic explanation (if I could understand it
![Grin ;D](https://www.menopausematters.co.uk/forum/Smileys/extended/grin.gif)
). I thought the Mirena worked by protecting the endometrium rather than having any systemic effect - but will be interesting to find out....
When you say you are taking oestrogen against the advice of your doctor - I mean I presume you have persuaded them to give you a prescription for it rather than self-medicating? In UK as you've probably read many GPs who are not specialists do not recognise some women's symptoms as being due to perimenopause but many specialist gynaecologists do - from menopause clinics or privately. Unfortumately there aren't enough of these available to women on NHS so many women have to argue their case with the doctor (or pay for a private consultation) and the outcome is very dependent on how open they are to being educated!
It sounds like your symptoms are abating through your treatement, and as Suzyq says - I do hope this continues!
![Smiley :)](https://www.menopausematters.co.uk/forum/Smileys/extended/smiley.gif)
Hurdity x