As stated Social care and paying for care does not mean that the care is any better/worse because we fund it ourselves.
![Angry >:(](https://www.menopausematters.co.uk/forum/Smileys/extended/angry.gif)
. The important thing is to consider end of life care first, will your relative need to move from one home to another in order to get full nursing care? Maybe then it is important that they go into a nursing home rather than retirement/care home sooner rather than later?
Payed-for care seems a lot but consider exactly what the client gets for the money: a roof over their heads, TV paid for, no cooking/cleaning etc., Nursing care when required, lifting assistance, an en-suite fascility [mostly]: costs have to cover payment of staff, laundry facilities, decorating between clients i.e. painting, new carpet, various Insurance costs, Pensions for each paid member of full-time Staff ……….. hopefully a GP when necessary and if needed, the visitation of a Clergyman of their choice. Care homes are not prisons, when people move in they are 'allowed' out if well enough and many have good 'days out' schemes to the coast, theatre etc.. Too many think that the money tied up in their homes should go to their children, well they should pass it over sooner - otherwise what is it for? For looking after their eventual care that's what. Because if they wait then it will be soaked up in fees or the children will pay Inheritance Tax eventually!
I know that we don't spend as much on our properties per year but we don't have the added costs of employing someone to crd of 4 us. The costs date back to when the property was bought/built and will include the cost of the plot of land. This isn't explained to potential clients.
We R so used to turning up at Hospital where everything is done for us we don't have to consider exactly how much running a care facility costs!